Licensed Professional Engineers |
Search/

Request a free quote

Free tool screening estimate

Eutectic Melting Calculator for Metals in Fire Debris

Whether two metals found together in fire debris can melt or alloy at a fire temperature: eutectic points, fully liquid mixes and the liquid fraction, on a simplified phase diagram.

Tool referenceDE-TOOL-10624

Method
Binary phase diagrams, lever rule
Metals
Copper, aluminum, zinc, tin, lead, silicon, silver
Output
Eutectic point, liquid range and liquid fraction

This eutectic melting calculator shows whether two metals found together in fire debris can melt or alloy at an estimated fire temperature. Copper and aluminum can make a liquid where they touch from 548.2 °C (1,018.8 °F), far below the 1,084.6 °C melting point of copper. In the worked example, at 650 °C every copper and aluminum mix from 4.3 to 61.1 wt% copper is fully liquid, although neither pure metal melts.

Eutectic melting calculator for metals in fire debris

Pick two metals found together in fire debris and an estimated local fire temperature. The calculator says whether either metal melts on its own, whether the two can make a liquid where they touch, which mixes are fully liquid and, if you know the composition, how much of it is liquid. Pick a quick start or enter your own case; the answer updates as you type.

The calculator needs JavaScript. The eutectic and melting points it uses are in the table on this page.

Quick start Fills in the form. Change anything after.

The metals

Pick the two metals found fused or touching. Copper and aluminum is the common case: aluminum from fixtures, housings or conductors melts onto copper wire. Zinc comes from die castings and galvanized parts, tin and lead from solder and tinned wire, silicon from cast aluminum, and silver from brazed joints.

The fire

Your best estimate of the temperature the metal reached at that spot, from fire patterns, other melted materials or a fire model. A metal part heats more slowly than the flames around it. The line under the result compares the value with published fire temperatures.

Composition (optional)

Result

Alloying can make liquid at 650 °C

Where the two metals touch, liquid can form from 548.2 °C (the eutectic at 32.7 wt% copper), 101.8 °C below this temperature.

At 650 °C, mixes of 4.3 to 61.1 wt% copper are fully liquid.

Pure aluminum melts at 660.3 °C and pure copper at 1,084.6 °C, so at 650 °C neither melts on its own.

Lowest temperature for liquid
548.2 °C
Your temperature minus that
+101.8 °C

Screening estimate. Equilibrium on a simplified two-metal diagram; real debris has other alloying elements, oxide films and short heating times. Alloying can leave beads or notches that look like arc damage, so confirm with the location relative to the aluminum or zinc source, sectioning and SEM/EDS. See fire investigation, or ask an engineer.

Simplified phase diagram of the two metalsSimplified copper and aluminum phase diagram. Liquid first forms at 548.2 °C. Fully liquid at 650 °C: 4.3 to 61.1 wt%.4006008001,000Al255075Cuwt% copperTemperature, °CLiquid548.2 °C650 °C
  • Liquidus
  • Phase boundary
  • Eutectic
  • Your temperature
  • Fully liquid
  • Your mix
Simplified: straight lines between cited points (sources below).

Fire temperature context

650 °C is above the roughly 600 °C (1,110 °F) usually taken as flashover and below the 900 to 1,000 °C (1,650 to 1,830 °F) typical of a fully developed room fire after flashover.

Gas and flame temperatures from V. Babrauskas, Temperatures in flames and fires. A metal part lags the gas or flames around it and needs time to heat up.

Full results and steps
Metalscopper and aluminum
Eutectic548.2 °C at 32.7 wt% copper
Eutectic1,035 °C at 92 wt% copper
Lowest temperature for liquid548.2 °C
Melting point of pure aluminum660.3 °C
Melting point of pure copper1,084.6 °C
Fully liquid at 650 °C4.3 to 61.1 wt%
  1. Lowest temperature at which this pair makes liquid: 548.2 °C. Your temperature minus that: 101.8 °C.
  2. Compositions above the liquidus at this temperature, fully liquid: 4.3 to 61.1 wt%.

Melted conductors or metal debris to explain?

Dreiym's licensed Professional Engineers examine conductors and metal debris from fire scenes, tell arc damage from fire melting and alloying, and document the evidence for origin and cause work. Free quote; we typically respond within one business day.

Assumptions and limits

Assumptions: equilibrium between two pure metals; the metal reaches the temperature you enter; compositions in weight percent; liquidus and solid boundaries drawn as straight lines between the cited points, so the liquid fraction is approximate between those points.

What this does not check: commercial alloys with three or more elements (cast aluminum alloys, brass, silver solders), oxide films that can delay wetting and alloying, heating time, cooling history, and melting by an electric arc. It does not tell whether a bead was caused by arcing.

Screening tool: Screening estimate for education and planning. Not an engineering study or a design, and not a substitute for a licensed engineer's review where one is required.

How the calculation works
  • Pure metals melt at their melting points. A pair of metals can make a liquid at a lower temperature where they touch: the lowest point of the liquidus, usually a eutectic.
  • The liquidus is drawn as straight lines through cited points: invariant reactions from the assessed diagrams and, between them for aluminum alloys, points calculated from the COST 507 database.
  • Fully liquid compositions at your temperature are the ones where the liquidus lies below it.
  • Below the liquidus, the tie line at your temperature runs from the solid phase boundary to the liquidus, and the lever rule gives the liquid fraction: (x − x solid) ÷ (x liquid − x solid).
  • The first liquid of a composition is found by stepping up in temperature in 0.1 °C steps until the liquid fraction is above zero.
Sources

Sources: J.L. Murray, The aluminium-copper system, Int. Met. Rev. 30 (1985) 211; N. Ponweiser, C.L. Lengauer and K.W. Richter, Re-investigation of phase equilibria in the system Al-Cu, Intermetallics 19 (2011) 1737; J.L. Murray and A.J. McAlister, The Al-Si system, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 5 (1984) 74; J.L. Murray, The Al-Zn system, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 4 (1983) 55; COST 507 thermochemical database for light metal alloys (Al-Cu, Al-Si, Al-Zn); NIST Phase Diagrams and Computational Thermodynamics, Cu-Sn, Pb-Sn and Ag-Cu systems; ITS-90 fixed points (NIST); V. Babrauskas, Temperatures in flames and fires, Fire Science and Technology Inc.; NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2024 edition.

Cite or share this tool

Dreiym Engineering. Eutectic melting calculator. Method: simplified binary phase diagrams (straight lines between cited points) and the lever rule. https://www.dreiym.com/eutectic-melting-calculator/

Instructors and shops are welcome to link to this tool or put its address on a handout. It is free, needs no sign-up and works on a phone.

How to use the calculator

Choose the two metals that are fused or touching, enter your estimate of the local temperature at that spot in °C or °F, and, if a lab has measured the composition of the melted mix, tick the box and enter it in weight percent. The result says whether either pure metal melts at that temperature, the lowest temperature at which the pair makes a liquid where it touches, which mixes are fully liquid, and the liquid fraction of your composition. The diagram shows the simplified phase diagram with your temperature and composition on it, and the full results list every value with the steps.

How to check whether two metals alloyed in a fire

  1. Identify the metals. Note which metals are fused together and where the second metal came from, for example an aluminum fixture housing above a copper conductor, a zinc die casting or a solder joint.
  2. Estimate the local temperature. Use the fire patterns, other melted materials and the fire’s development to estimate the temperature the metal reached at that spot. A metal part lags the gas or flames around it.
  3. Compare with the melting points. Check whether either pure metal could melt at that temperature.
  4. Compare with the eutectic. If the temperature is at or above the lowest liquid temperature of the pair, contact alloying can make a liquid that dissolves the other metal, even though neither metal melts on its own.
  5. Confirm with the artifact. Alloying is a possibility, not a finding. Confirm it with the location of the damage relative to the aluminum or zinc source, a cross section and an elemental analysis such as SEM/EDS.

Worked example

The cast aluminum housing of a ceiling fixture melts and runs onto a copper branch-circuit conductor. The estimated local temperature is 650 °C (1,202 °F), above the roughly 600 °C usually taken as flashover.

  • Pure aluminum melts at 660.3 °C and pure copper at 1,084.6 °C, so neither pure metal melts at 650 °C. Commercial cast aluminum alloys start to melt lower than pure aluminum because of their silicon and copper, which is how molten aluminum reaches the conductor.
  • Copper and aluminum make a liquid from 548.2 °C, the eutectic at 32.7 wt% copper, which is 101.8 °C below 650 °C.
  • At 650 °C the liquidus lies below the fire temperature from 4.3 wt% copper (between the cited points at 2 wt% and 656 °C and at 5 wt% and 648 °C) to 61.1 wt% copper (between 59.6 wt% at 625 °C and 70.2 wt% at 804 °C). Any mix in that range is fully liquid, so molten aluminum can keep dissolving the copper it touches until the local mix passes about 61 wt% copper.
  • A lab finds 20 wt% copper in the solidified mass. Its liquidus is 603 °C and it starts to melt at the 548.2 °C eutectic, so at 650 °C it was fully liquid.

The result is consistent with alloying: a copper conductor can be thinned, notched or beaded where molten aluminum touched it at a temperature well below its own melting point. It does not show how the bead formed. The location relative to the housing and a lab examination of the conductor decide that.

Eutectic and melting points of metals found in fire debris

MetalsLowest temperature for liquidAtPure metals melt at
Copper and aluminum548.2 °C (1,018.8 °F), eutectic32.7 wt% copperAluminum 660.3 °C, copper 1,084.6 °C
Aluminum and silicon (cast aluminum)577 °C (1,070.6 °F), eutectic12.6 wt% siliconAluminum 660.3 °C, silicon 1,414 °C
Aluminum and zinc381 °C (717.8 °F), eutecticAbout 95 wt% zincZinc 419.5 °C, aluminum 660.3 °C
Copper and tin226.8 °C (440.2 °F), eutectic99.1 wt% tinTin 231.9 °C, copper 1,084.6 °C
Tin and lead (solder)182.2 °C (360 °F), eutectic62.1 wt% tinTin 231.9 °C, lead 327.5 °C
Copper and silver (brazing alloy)779.1 °C (1,434.4 °F), eutectic71.6 wt% silverSilver 961.8 °C, copper 1,084.6 °C

Copper and aluminum also have a second eutectic on the copper side, at about 1,035 °C and 92 wt% copper. Tin and lead solder is often quoted at 183 °C and 61.9 wt% tin; the table gives the NIST calculated values. Melting points of the pure metals are the ITS-90 fixed points for tin, zinc, aluminum, silver and copper.

Fire temperatures for context

WhereTemperature
Flame tips of turbulent fire plumesAbout 320 to 400 °C (610 to 750 °F)
Flashover: average upper-layer gas temperatureAbout 600 °C (1,110 °F)
Continuous flame region of small firesAbout 900 °C (1,650 °F)
Fully developed room fire after flashover, typical900 to 1,000 °C (1,650 to 1,830 °F)
Maximum regularly found in room firesAbout 1,200 °C (2,190 °F)

Values from V. Babrauskas, Temperatures in flames and fires (Fire Science and Technology Inc.), which also notes that fire temperatures measured with thermocouples in buildings can be imprecise and that an object next to a flame does not take its temperature at once. Use them to judge whether an estimate is reasonable, not to set the temperature of a particular spot.

What this means for reading a conductor

Alloying can leave beads, notches, thinning or holes on a copper conductor that look like arc damage, at temperatures where copper alone would not melt. Before reading a melted conductor as an arc site, check whether aluminum, zinc or tin was above or against it, look for the second metal on the surface, and section the artifact: SEM/EDS shows whether the melted region holds aluminum or zinc, and X-ray imaging can show the conductor inside a mass of melted metal before it is cut. NFPA 921 discusses alloying among the melting effects an investigator must tell apart from arcing. Our article on the differences between arcing and melting damage covers the features of each.

Frequently asked questions

What is eutectic melting?

Two metals in contact can dissolve into each other and form an alloy that melts at a lower temperature than either metal alone. The lowest such temperature is the eutectic point. For copper and aluminum it is 548.2 °C, about 110 °C below the melting point of aluminum and more than 500 °C below that of copper.

Can a house fire melt copper wire?

A fully developed room fire is typically 900 to 1,000 °C, below copper’s melting point of 1,084.6 °C, but higher local temperatures occur and copper conductors are often found melted. Alloying with aluminum, zinc or tin is one way copper is consumed at much lower temperatures, which is why melted copper alone does not prove a high temperature or an arc.

Why does the calculator use weight percent?

Lab reports of melted debris, such as EDS results, usually give weight percent. Some of the phase diagram sources use atomic percent; those values were converted to weight percent for the calculator.

How accurate is the liquid fraction?

The diagrams are simplified: straight lines between cited points from assessed phase diagrams, so the fraction is approximate between those points, mostly where the true curves bow. Real debris also holds other alloying elements and oxides and may not reach equilibrium in the short time of a fire. Treat the fraction as a screening estimate.

Why are brass and steel not in the list?

Copper and zinc, the metals of brass, form no eutectic: their phase diagram has a series of peritectic reactions instead, and liquid first appears where zinc melts, at 419.5 °C. Steel melts far above typical building fire temperatures. The calculator covers pairs with an assessed two-metal diagram from published sources.

When to bring in an engineer

A phase diagram tells what can melt at a temperature, not what caused a bead or a failure. Dreiym’s licensed Professional Engineers examine conductors and metal debris from fire scenes, document their location, and use cross sections, SEM/EDS and X-ray imaging to tell arc damage from fire melting and alloying. See our fire and explosion investigation and forensic electrical engineering services, the galvanic corrosion chart for metals in contact that do not melt, or contact us for a free quote. We typically respond within one business day.

Need more than a screening estimate?

We typically respond within one business day.

Request a free quoteor call (866) 621-6920